During April 2024, ISO 20121 the global event sustainability management standard underwent a revision and is now called ISO 20121:2024.
During the revision of the standard in 2023 - key areas of the standard were revised and it now includes new requirements in areas such as climates change, legacy and child & human rights and safe guarding.
This interview with CEO Fiona Pelham, chair of the ISO 20121-2024 committee - talks about The Organisation and it’s Context (4.1). In this interview 3 questions were asked:
In each interview there were 3 questions asked:
What are the key changes?
What does this mean for the future?
How can this be practically implemented?
4.1 Understanding the organisation and its context
The organisation shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that affect its ability to achieve the intended results of its event sustainability management system.
This shall include consideration of its social, economic environmental impacts. And more specifically, the organisation shall determine whether climate change is a relevant issue.
Note 1: Consideration of the SDGs and other relevant frameworks can assist in determining the issues to be addressed.
Note 2: Tools that are commonly used to determine external and internal issues include but are not limited to swot and pestle analysis.
6.1.2 Issue Identification
The organisation shall establish implement and maintain a process to identify its sustainable development issues and to evaluate their significance. Associated with its event, related activities, products and services within the defined scope of the event. Sustainability management system.
Note, the issue identification process may be referred to as a materiality assessment or as a double materiality assessment. When identifying issues related to both the organisation and society at large the identification of issues can where applicable encompass the following, but not limited to
A.
environmental
resource utilization
materials choice
circularity
resources
conservation
emissions
reduction
climate change
environmental resilience
biodiversity
preservation
releases to land water and air
digital responsibility
Note 1- Environmental resilience is the capacity of an ecosystem to respond to a disturbance by resisting damage and recovering quickly without shifting to an alternative state or losing function or services.
Note 2 - Digital responsibility is using technology in an ethical, including information, security and data protection, responsible way to reduce the environmental footprint and allow positive social impact.
B.
social
human and child rights, labour standards
health and safety, mental health
well-being
civil liberties
social justice, local community, indigenous rights
culture and religion
accessibility
social impacts.
diversity
equality and inclusion
digital responsibility
C.
economic
local economy
market capacity and presence employment
shareholders value and return on investment
innovation
direct and indirect economic impact
risk
fair trade
economic inclusion, professional skills and profit sharing
In addition to those sustainable development issues that an organization can control directly.
An organisation shall also consider issues that it can influence.
The criteria used for the evaluation of significance shall be documented, and shall include a consideration of feedback from interested parties and the identification of new and relevant emerging issues and if applicable, scientific and academic research.
The outputs of the process shall be documented, kept up to date and shared with relevant interested parties.
Note 3. Many issues cut across economic, social and environmental categories.
These can include:
food and beverage
governance
transport
venue selection
supplier selection
accessibility
animal welfare
corruption
product
responsibility
Note 4. See annex C for further guidance. The list of issues contained in Table C.1 is non exhaustive.